Primitive Classification contains the first attempt by Durkheim and Mauss to develop a. French version of the sociology of knowl- edge. I have chosen to deal with. In this influential work, first published in English in , Durkheim and Mauss claim that the individual mind is capable of classification and they seek the origin . Essays and criticism on Émile Durkheim, Marcel Mauss’ Primitive Classification – Critical Essays.
|Published (Last):||25 July 2005|
|PDF File Size:||8.79 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.18 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
And even when abstract dualisms are provisionally allowed e. Charles Lindholm – – Ethos: Request removal from index.
Prospects for a Psychoevolutionary Approach. Origin of the Species and Genus Concepts: Sharma – – Ess Ess Publications. Interactive Classification and Practice in the Social Sciences.
Jack Mills – unknown. Scott Atran – – Journal of the History of Biology xlassification 2: They are wrong because our desired classification of persons tends to reject dualisms at least in the humanities and some social sciences. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
History of Western Philosophy. No categories specified categorize this paper.
Selected Writings in Social Theory. Instead, I think that this hunch, is in effect a form of Primitive Classification unique to certain collectives in the social and human sciences most other sciences and most other lay persons have no problem with dualisms and hierarchical privileging of one abstract thing over the other.
Charles Starkey – – Philosophical Psychology 21 6: Durkheim and Mauss went on to argue for instance, mauzs if persons divided themselves into two groups, then they divided the world of animals, plants, etc.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Dewey Decimal Classification for Indology: Ebach – – Palgrave-Macmillan.
Relationships and Durkhrim in the Natural Sciences. No keywords specified fix it. From here Durkheim reasoned that an equally rigid classification of things should follow such that subsumptive relations between groups resulted in analogous part whole classifications at the level of natural phenomena.
Second, that the style of classification of persons should result in an analogous style of classifying things. I think that these two principles can help to explain a lot of quirky features dukrheim contemporary social theory. Durkheim and Mauss Revisited: Monthly downloads Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
From this they argue that the mode of classification is determined by the form of society and that the notions of space, time, hierarchy, number, class and other such cognitive categories are products of society. Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge. La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 66 2: